Analysis of hospital procurement | Bidding report of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment from January to October 2023
Overall situation
According to statistics, from January to October 2023, a total of 11,719 winning bids for ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment were collected, involving 4,478 purchasing units and 168 brand owners.
Subdivided variety
According to the bidding results, the number of whole-body ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment was the largest, followed by portable ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment and cardiac ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment.
Figure 1. Number distribution of subdivided varieties of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment winning bids from January to October 2023 (unit: pieces)
Bid winning trend
The market size of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment bidding in each quarter of 2023 is as follows: The total amount of the bid for ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment from January to October 2023 increased by 15.9% over the same period last year; The total number of bids increased by 18.3% over the same period last year.
Figure 2. The bidding trend of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment in 2023
Brand model analysis
According to the results of disclosed brand and amount data, from January to October of 2023, General Electric ranked first, with 26.3% of the total amount awarded; Philips ranked second, accounting for 23.9% of the total bid; Mindray ranked third, accounting for 23.3% of the total bid.
Figure 3. Top10 Ultrasonic imaging diagnostic Equipment brands from January to October 2023
| Ranking | Brand | Proportion of General Amount | Quantity Proportion |
| 1 | GE | 26.3% | 18.5% |
| 2 | Philips | 23.9% | 15.4% |
| 3. | Mindray | 23.3% | 30.4% |
| 4. | Sonoscape | 4.2% | 6.8% |
| 5. | Siemens | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| 6. | Samsung | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| 7 | Fujifilm | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| 8 | Canon | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| 9. | Esaote | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| 10 | Vinno | 1.1% | 2.2% |
From the model analysis, from January to October 2023, Philips model EPIQ 7C ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment ranked first, with a total bid proportion of 5.0%, ranking second and third from General Electric, models Voluson E10 and LOGIQ E11, with a total bid proportion of 4.8% and 3.0%, respectively.
Figure 4. Ranking of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment brands and models from January to October 2023 (Top10)
| Ranking | Brand | Specifications and Models | Percentage of Total | Quantity Proportion |
| 1 | Philips | EPIQ7C | 5.0% | 2.4% |
| 2 | GE | Voluson E11 | 4.8%% | 2.3% |
| 3. | Ge | LOGIQ E11 | 3.0% | 1.6% |
| 4. | Philips | EPIQ7 | 2.9% | 1.6% |
| 5. | Philips | EPIQ5 | 2.5% | 1.6% |
| 6. | GE | VOIUSON E8 | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| 7 | Siemens | ACUSON SEQUOIA SILVER | 2.1% | 1.2% |
| 8 | GE | VIVID E95 | 2.0% | 0.9% |
| 9. | Philips | EPIQ CVx | 2.0% | 0.8% |
| 10 | GE | LOGIQ E10s | 1.8% | 1.0% |
Regional market
According to the bidding results, from January to October 2023, the bidding of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment is more active in Guangdong Province, accounting for 10.9%; Zhejiang Province ranked second, accounting for 6.3 percent. Henan Province ranked third, accounting for 5.8 percent.
Figure 5 Ranking of winning bids of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment in provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) from January to October 2023 (Unit: 10,000 yuan)
| Ranking | Provinces | Amount proportion | Quantity Proportion |
| 1 | Guangdong | 10.9% | 10.8% |
| 2 | Zhejiang | 6.3% | 6.7% |
| 3. | Henan | 5.8% | 5.5% |
| 4. | Jiangsu | 5.6% | 6.7% |
| 5. | Hubei | 5.2% | 5.1% |
| 6. | Shandong | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| 7 | Sichuan | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| 8 | Jiangxi | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| 9. | Hebei | 4.5% | 3.5% |
| 10 | Hunan | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Ranking of tenderers
According to the bidding results, the bidding unit with the highest amount of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment purchase from January to October 2023 was Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, the Cancer Prevention and Control Center of Sun Yat-sen University ranked second, and the Luoyang Central Hospital ranked third.
Figure 6. Top10 Procurement Rankings of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment of national bidding units from January to October 2023
| Ranking | Winning bidders | location | Proportion of
Procurement Amount |
Quantity Proportion
|
| 1 | Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University | Beijing Municipality | 0.9 | 0.7% |
| 2 | Cancer Prevention and Control Center of Sun Yat-sen University | Guangdong Province | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 3. | Luoyang Municipal Central Hospital | Henan Province | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| 4. | Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission | Jiangsu Province | 0.5% | 1.3% |
| 5. | Hainan Provincial Health Commission Pharmacy Management Center | Hainan Province | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| 6. | Second Attached Hospital of Zhengzhou University | Henan Province | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| 7 | Tianjin Central Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital | Tianjin Municipality | 4% | 0.2% |
| 8 | Zhoukou Municipal Central Hospital | Henan Province | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| 9. | Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University | Liaoning Province | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| 10 | Guizhou Provincial People” Hospital | Guizhou Province | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Ranking of winning bidders
According to the results of the bidding, the highest bidder in the total sales of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment from January to October 2023 was Shanghai Yousheng Trading Co., LTD., accounting for 0.8%, Guangdong Longkang Fangcheng Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. ranked second, accounting for 0.7%, and the third was Beijing Zhonghe Lianxin Supply Chain Management Co., LTD., accounting for 0.6%.
Figure 7 Sales ranking of successful bidders of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment from January to October 2023 (Top10)
| Ranking | Winning bidders | Percentage of sales | Quantity Proportion
|
Proportion of dealer performance |
| 1 | Shanghai Yousheng Trading Co., LTD | 0.8% | 0.9% | 100% |
| 2 | Guangdong Longkang Fangcheng Medical Equipment Co., Ltd | 0.7% | 0.0% | 99.7% |
| 3. | Bijing Zhonghe Lianxin Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd | 0.6% | 0.3% | 32.3% |
| 4. | Sichuan Tianfu Yadu International Trade Co., Ltd | 0.5% | 0.4% | 20.6 |
| 5. | Sinopharm Guangdong Medical Equipment Co., Ltd | 0.5% | 0.5% | 12.5% |
| 6. | Sinopharm Shanxi Co., Ltd | 0.4% | 0.3% | 12.1% |
| 7 | Henan Zhonglian Inspection Technology Co., Ltd | 0.4% | 0.3% | 41% |
| 8 | Beijing Jingmiao Zhonglian Trading Co., Ltd | 0.4% | 0.2% | 98.0% |
| 9. | Zhongyi Medical Equipment (Guangdong) Co., Ltd | 0.4% | 0.3% | 10.1% |
| 10 | Sinopharm International Guangzhou Ltd. | 0.4% | 0.3% | 26.3% |
Note: The proportion of the winning unit’s performance refers to the proportion of the sales of ultrasonic imaging diagnostic equipment in the total sales of the winning unit.
China is encouraging China end uses for more domestic products in latest years. Thus, more and more overseas manufacturers are planning localization in China. BradyKnows localization team has extensive experiences in facility establishment, audit, supplier evaluation, manufacturing, registration, and marketing in China. Pls feel free to let us know any questions on China entry via info@bradyknowsmedical.com
Source：JOINCHAIN, MDCLOUD
Translated & edited： Bradyknow
